View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Facilitation Question Burst |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a problem gets covered up too quickly with answers, Question Burst puts the better question at the center. The format opens the thinking space before the group commits to an interpretation. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 15-45 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 1-3 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Question List, Reframed Challenge, Learning Prompts |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | QuestionsReframingFacilitationSensemaking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






