Plan my session
Plan a concrete work block with agenda, roles, preparation, and a copyable result artifact.
Session: Waste Analysis
The plan translates the method into a concrete facilitated work block. Your inputs flow directly into the session brief and work artifact.
Method session with 2-8. The plan uses the existing method logic and the runsheet.
RunsheetUse the session for shared understanding. Contributions are collected visibly, assumptions are aligned, and open differences remain traceable in the artifact.
The session works directly toward Waste Map. After the session, the artifact should be shareable, reviewable, or reusable.
- 1
Phase 1: Explain categories
20 minIntroduce TIMWOOD categories with concrete examples from the process. Ensure everyone understands the difference between overprocessing and overproduction. Hint: Knowledge work often needs adapted examples: waiting for approval, inventory as unfinished tickets.
FacilitatorWaste Map - 2
Phase 2: Walk-through or observation
2-4 hObserve the process at gemba or walk through it step by step. For each step, check which TIMWOOD waste occurs and with what frequency. Hint: If a step has "no waste", question it critically. Waiting is often hidden because it is considered normal.
FacilitatorPriorisierte Verschwendung - 3
Phase 3: Quantification
60 minEstimate rough damage per identified waste (time, money, defect rate). Sort top 7 by impact. Mark data gaps as follow-up. Hint: Without rough quantification, prioritization becomes mood. Even plus/minus 50% is enough for priority.
FacilitatorImprovement Backlog - 4
Phase 4: Elimination candidates
60 minMark top 3 wastes with high impact and low effort as immediate actions. Plan complex topics as Kaizen event or standard-work adjustment. Hint: Waste forced by compliance is not an elimination candidate without talking to compliance owner.
OwnerWaste Map - 5
Publish artifact
10 minCheck the artifact for completeness, define location, set version or status, and name review recipients.
OwnerWaste Map
Session Brief
For invitations, boards, tickets, PR descriptions, or workshop notes.
session-brief.md
Session Brief: Waste Analysis
Goal
Artifact: Waste Map
Working Question
Which types of waste occur in the analyzed process with which frequency and effort?
Context
Current target process; KPI state of the last 30 days; previous waste discussions or audits; known compliance obligations that force waste.
Setup
- Format: Method session
- Duration: Half day to full day
- Mode: Workshop
- Participants: One facilitator with Lean experience; two to four operators or knowledge workers from the process; one process owner with decision authority; optional external Lean coach.
- Owner: One facilitator with Lean experience
- Participation mode: Team round, shared work and alignment
- Outcome logic: Finish artifact
Participation Logic
Use the session for shared understanding. Contributions are collected visibly, assumptions are aligned, and open differences remain traceable in the artifact.
Outcome Logic
The session works directly toward Waste Map. After the session, the artifact should be shareable, reviewable, or reusable.
Input
TIMWOOD table template (Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Overprocessing, Defects); observation sheet; stopwatch; list of all process steps; layout plan or value stream.
Preparation
Wall or board with columns per TIMWOOD category. Space per column for observations, estimated frequency, and impact. Separate observation phase and evaluation phase clearly.
Agenda
-
Phase 1: Explain categories (20 min) Owner: Facilitator Action: Introduce TIMWOOD categories with concrete examples from the process. Ensure everyone understands the difference between overprocessing and overproduction. Hint: Knowledge work often needs adapted examples: waiting for approval, inventory as unfinished tickets. Output: Waste Map
-
Phase 2: Walk-through or observation (2-4 h) Owner: Facilitator Action: Observe the process at gemba or walk through it step by step. For each step, check which TIMWOOD waste occurs and with what frequency. Hint: If a step has "no waste", question it critically. Waiting is often hidden because it is considered normal. Output: Priorisierte Verschwendung
-
Phase 3: Quantification (60 min) Owner: Facilitator Action: Estimate rough damage per identified waste (time, money, defect rate). Sort top 7 by impact. Mark data gaps as follow-up. Hint: Without rough quantification, prioritization becomes mood. Even plus/minus 50% is enough for priority. Output: Improvement Backlog
-
Phase 4: Elimination candidates (60 min) Owner: Owner Action: Mark top 3 wastes with high impact and low effort as immediate actions. Plan complex topics as Kaizen event or standard-work adjustment. Hint: Waste forced by compliance is not an elimination candidate without talking to compliance owner. Output: Waste Map
-
Publish artifact (10 min) Owner: Owner Action: Check the artifact for completeness, define location, set version or status, and name review recipients. Output: Waste Map
Closeout
- Update result artifact: Waste Map
- Define location, version, and review recipients.
- Define owner, next step, and review date.
Work artifact
Pre-filled starting point based on the matching template.
work-artifact.md
Waste Map: Waste Analysis
Working Question
Which types of waste occur in the analyzed process with which frequency and effort?
Context
Current target process; KPI state of the last 30 days; previous waste discussions or audits; known compliance obligations that force waste.
Participants
- Owner: One facilitator with Lean experience
- Participants: One facilitator with Lean experience; two to four operators or knowledge workers from the process; one process owner with decision authority; optional external Lean coach.
Input
TIMWOOD table template (Transport, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Overprocessing, Defects); observation sheet; stopwatch; list of all process steps; layout plan or value stream.
Template
Waste Analysis Canvas
Context
What is this method used for?
Core question
Which question should be answered at the end?
Input
Which data, observations, or materials are available?
Working area
- Area 1:
- Area 2:
- Area 3:
- Relationships / patterns:
Output artifacts
- Waste Map:
- Prioritized Waste:
- Improvement Backlog:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, and success signal.
Completion Check
- Waste Map is complete enough for review:
- Location:
- Version / status:
- Review by:
- Next step:
Next Step
- Review result
- Mark open questions
- Schedule review or decision
Waste Analysis Working Template
View templateCompact working template for Waste Analysis with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.canvas
waste-analysis-working-template.md
Compact working template for Waste Analysis with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.
Waste Analysis Canvas
Context
What is this method used for?
Core question
Which question should be answered at the end?
Input
Which data, observations, or materials are available?
Working area
- Area 1:
- Area 2:
- Area 3:
- Relationships / patterns:
Output artifacts
- Waste Map:
- Prioritized Waste:
- Improvement Backlog:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, and success signal.
- Working question, owner, and target artifact are visible.
- The result fits Waste Map.
- Date, process name, and facilitator in header. Follow-up analyses compare to previous version. Immediate-action completion as append log.
- Open questions are noted as follow-ups.
- The next review or decision point is scheduled.