Plan my session
Plan a concrete work block with agenda, roles, preparation, and a copyable result artifact.
Session: Stakeholder Salience Model
The plan translates the method into a concrete facilitated work block. Your inputs flow directly into the session brief and work artifact.
Method session with 3-6. The plan uses the existing method logic and the runsheet.
RunsheetUse the session for shared understanding. Contributions are collected visibly, assumptions are aligned, and open differences remain traceable in the artifact.
The session works directly toward Salience-Diagramm. After the session, the artifact should be shareable, reviewable, or reusable.
- 1
Phase 1: Calibrate three dimensions
15 minClarify definitions: Power (formal/informal influence), Legitimacy (recognized validity of claims), Urgency (time-critical pressure). Examples per dimension. Hint: Combination of the three dimensions creates eight classes (including stakeholders without all three = non-stakeholder). Mixing definitions creates wrong classification.
FacilitatorSalience-Diagramm - 2
Phase 2: Classify stakeholders
25-40 minMake three yes/no decisions per stakeholder: has Power? has Legitimacy? has Urgency? Position in Venn diagram follows. Hint: When discussing, note rationale. Be honest on Power/Legitimacy/Urgency: making a claim does not automatically create Legitimacy.
FacilitatorStrategie pro Klasse - 3
Phase 3: Interpret classes
15-20 minWork out meaning per class: Definitive (all three) = top priority; Dangerous (Power+Urgency, no Legitimacy) = risk stakeholder; Dependent (Legitimacy+Urgency, no Power) = needs protection. Hint: Dangerous class is especially sensitive (actors with power and pressure, but no legitimate basis). They need active conflict management, not ignoring.
FacilitatorSalience-Diagramm - 4
Phase 4: Strategy per class
15-20 minDerive strategy per class. Definitive: close involvement. Dominant (Power+Legitimacy): proactive information. Dangerous: risk mitigation. Dormant (only Power): monitor. Owner and cadence per class. Hint: Strategy without cadence decays. Concrete action and date per class. Definitive stakeholders typically need weekly cadence, others monthly or ad-hoc.
OwnerStrategie pro Klasse - 5
Publish artifact
10 minCheck the artifact for completeness, define location, set version or status, and name review recipients.
OwnerSalience-Diagramm
Session Brief
For invitations, boards, tickets, PR descriptions, or workshop notes.
session-brief.md
Session Brief: Stakeholder Salience Model
Goal
Artifact: Salience-Diagramm
Working Question
Which stakeholders combine which combination of power, legitimacy and urgency, and which strategy follows for each of the eight classes?
Context
Stakeholder list; definitions per dimension (Power, Legitimacy, Urgency); known histories and alliances; current escalation topics; past conflict patterns.
Setup
- Format: Method session
- Duration: 60-90 min
- Mode: Workshop
- Participants: One facilitator with experience in stakeholder analysis; sponsor or project lead; 3-5 participants with political understanding; scribe for strategy notes.
- Owner: One facilitator with experience in stakeholder analysis
- Participation mode: Team round, shared work and alignment
- Outcome logic: Finish artifact
Participation Logic
Use the session for shared understanding. Contributions are collected visibly, assumptions are aligned, and open differences remain traceable in the artifact.
Outcome Logic
The session works directly toward Salience-Diagramm. After the session, the artifact should be shareable, reviewable, or reusable.
Input
Whiteboard or Miro board with three overlapping circles (Venn diagram: Power, Legitimacy, Urgency); stakeholder cards; definitions per dimension as banner; confidential storage; pens.
Preparation
Venn diagram with three circles (Power, Legitimacy, Urgency). Mark seven intersections (Dormant, Discretionary, Demanding, Dominant, Dangerous, Dependent, Definitive). Definitions written. Announce confidentiality.
Agenda
-
Phase 1: Calibrate three dimensions (15 min) Owner: Facilitator Action: Clarify definitions: Power (formal/informal influence), Legitimacy (recognized validity of claims), Urgency (time-critical pressure). Examples per dimension. Hint: Combination of the three dimensions creates eight classes (including stakeholders without all three = non-stakeholder). Mixing definitions creates wrong classification. Output: Salience-Diagramm
-
Phase 2: Classify stakeholders (25-40 min) Owner: Facilitator Action: Make three yes/no decisions per stakeholder: has Power? has Legitimacy? has Urgency? Position in Venn diagram follows. Hint: When discussing, note rationale. Be honest on Power/Legitimacy/Urgency: making a claim does not automatically create Legitimacy. Output: Strategie pro Klasse
-
Phase 3: Interpret classes (15-20 min) Owner: Facilitator Action: Work out meaning per class: Definitive (all three) = top priority; Dangerous (Power+Urgency, no Legitimacy) = risk stakeholder; Dependent (Legitimacy+Urgency, no Power) = needs protection. Hint: Dangerous class is especially sensitive (actors with power and pressure, but no legitimate basis). They need active conflict management, not ignoring. Output: Salience-Diagramm
-
Phase 4: Strategy per class (15-20 min) Owner: Owner Action: Derive strategy per class. Definitive: close involvement. Dominant (Power+Legitimacy): proactive information. Dangerous: risk mitigation. Dormant (only Power): monitor. Owner and cadence per class. Hint: Strategy without cadence decays. Concrete action and date per class. Definitive stakeholders typically need weekly cadence, others monthly or ad-hoc. Output: Strategie pro Klasse
-
Publish artifact (10 min) Owner: Owner Action: Check the artifact for completeness, define location, set version or status, and name review recipients. Output: Salience-Diagramm
Closeout
- Update result artifact: Salience-Diagramm
- Define location, version, and review recipients.
- Define owner, next step, and review date.
Work artifact
Pre-filled starting point based on the matching template.
work-artifact.md
Salience-Diagramm: Stakeholder Salience Model
Working Question
Which stakeholders combine which combination of power, legitimacy and urgency, and which strategy follows for each of the eight classes?
Context
Stakeholder list; definitions per dimension (Power, Legitimacy, Urgency); known histories and alliances; current escalation topics; past conflict patterns.
Participants
- Owner: One facilitator with experience in stakeholder analysis
- Participants: One facilitator with experience in stakeholder analysis; sponsor or project lead; 3-5 participants with political understanding; scribe for strategy notes.
Input
Whiteboard or Miro board with three overlapping circles (Venn diagram: Power, Legitimacy, Urgency); stakeholder cards; definitions per dimension as banner; confidential storage; pens.
Template
Stakeholder Salience Model Canvas
Context
What is this method used for?
Core question
Which question should be answered at the end?
Input
Which data, observations, or materials are available?
Working area
- Area 1:
- Area 2:
- Area 3:
- Relationships / patterns:
Output artifacts
- Salience diagram:
- Strategy by class:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, success signal.
Completion Check
- Salience-Diagramm is complete enough for review:
- Location:
- Version / status:
- Review by:
- Next step:
Next Step
- Review result
- Mark open questions
- Schedule review or decision
Stakeholder Salience Model Working Template
View templateCompact working template for Stakeholder Salience Model with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.canvas
stakeholder-salience-model-working-template.md
Compact working template for Stakeholder Salience Model with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.
Stakeholder Salience Model Canvas
Context
What is this method used for?
Core question
Which question should be answered at the end?
Input
Which data, observations, or materials are available?
Working area
- Area 1:
- Area 2:
- Area 3:
- Relationships / patterns:
Output artifacts
- Salience diagram:
- Strategy by class:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, success signal.
- Working question, owner, and target artifact are visible.
- The result fits Salience-Diagramm.
- Re-run quarterly or on mandate change. Archive previous version with date. Class changes with rationale. Confidential. Update immediately on personnel change.
- Open questions are noted as follow-ups.
- The next review or decision point is scheduled.