methodatlas
Method guideInnovation

SCAMPER

A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.

ComplexityLow
Time30-60 min
Participants2-10
FormatWorkshop
MaturityEstablished
Plan the work
01

Prerequisite

What needs to be finished first

Complete firstExisting object

A concrete current solution or clear flow exists.

Without a starting object, the operators become arbitrary.
Complete firstImprovement aim

User and intended effect are named.

Without an aim, variations lack a selection criterion.
02

Preparation

What needs to be ready before start

Materials

SCAMPER matrix, cards, pens, a description or model of the current solution and a timer.

People / roles

Facilitator, two to ten people with usage, domain or delivery perspectives; one person documents.

Pre-read

Gather the current flow, relevant user signals, technical or regulatory constraints and known variants.

Time needed

30–60 minutes

Setup

Prepare seven operator rows and keep the starting object visible. Park evaluation until the ideation pass is complete.

03

Core question

The one question this method answers

How can seven distinct directions of change improve this existing solution?

04

Flow

Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall

SCAMPER structures ideation around an existing object: Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate and Reverse/Rearrange. The operators alter concrete components and are evaluated only after the full pass.

SCAMPER

Fictional example

Seven operators applied to a fictional course portal; the row prompt holds the question and examples show variation and expected benefit.

SCAMPER
OperatorFictional variationExpected benefit / check
S · SubstituteWhich component can be replaced by something better?Replace the printed starter pack with guided in-app onboarding.Less media switching during the first start.
C · CombineWhich elements create more value together?Combine course selection and a learning-goal check in one entry.Fewer steps to a suitable recommendation.
A · AdaptWhich proven solution from another context fits here?Adapt a fitness-app progress cue to learning streaks.More motivating progress; test acceptance with learners.
M · ModifyWhat can be enlarged, reduced or reweighted?Shorten the first lesson to five minutes.Faster first success; comprehension must not fall.
P · Put to another useWhat additional use can an existing component serve?Use the final quiz as a personal learning recommendation.Existing answers create follow-up value.
E · EliminateWhat can disappear without loss?Remove mandatory profile setup before the first course.Shorter path; profile data is collected later.
R · Reverse / RearrangeWhich sequence or relationship can be reversed?Start with a sample task and offer explanation afterward.Action before explanation; observe overload in testing.

  1. 1. Fictional variation

    S · Substitute
    Replace the printed starter pack with guided in-app onboarding.
    C · Combine
    Combine course selection and a learning-goal check in one entry.
    A · Adapt
    Adapt a fitness-app progress cue to learning streaks.
    M · Modify
    Shorten the first lesson to five minutes.
    P · Put to another use
    Use the final quiz as a personal learning recommendation.
    E · Eliminate
    Remove mandatory profile setup before the first course.
    R · Reverse / Rearrange
    Start with a sample task and offer explanation afterward.

  2. 2. Expected benefit / check

    S · Substitute
    Less media switching during the first start.
    C · Combine
    Fewer steps to a suitable recommendation.
    A · Adapt
    More motivating progress; test acceptance with learners.
    M · Modify
    Faster first success; comprehension must not fall.
    P · Put to another use
    Existing answers create follow-up value.
    E · Eliminate
    Shorter path; profile data is collected later.
    R · Reverse / Rearrange
    Action before explanation; observe overload in testing.

Variations remain unevaluated until the full pass is complete.

Bob Eberle · SCAMPER

  1. 1

    Baseline

    Define the object and aim

    Goal

    One existing product, service or process becomes the object of variation.

    Inputs for this step

    • Existing solution
    • Observed problem or aim

    Actions

    • State the object, user group and desired improvement in one sentence.
    • Mark fixed constraints and available evidence.

    Output

    SCAMPER brief

    Object · user · aim · constraints

    Quality check

    Is it clear which concrete component may be varied?

    Pitfall

    The group tries to transform an abstract problem without an existing solution. Choose a concrete object, version and observed usage context.

    Timing: 5–8 minutes

  2. 2

    Operators

    Apply seven change operators

    Goal

    All seven SCAMPER directions create targeted variations rather than free repetition.

    Inputs for this step

    • SCAMPER brief
    • Seven operator questions

    Actions

    • Apply Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate and Reverse/Rearrange in turn.
    • Capture several variations per operator; delay evaluation until the full pass is complete.

    Output

    Variation pool

    S · C · A · M · P · E · R

    Quality check

    Does every operator produce at least one distinct variation?

    Pitfall

    The group repeats the same favorite idea under several letters. Change the component under examination and answer the exact operator question.

    Timing: 20–35 minutes

  3. 3

    Concepts

    Combine variations into concepts

    Goal

    Compatible changes are bundled into understandable whole concepts.

    Inputs for this step

    • Variation pool
    • Aim and constraints

    Actions

    • Cluster variations with similar effects and combine two or three compatible changes.
    • For each concept, describe benefit, affected components and critical assumption.

    Output

    Concept cards

    Combination · benefit · assumption

    Quality check

    Is each concept more than a renamed single idea?

    Pitfall

    The shortlist contains loose thoughts without a recognizable use scenario. Connect variations into a before-and-after flow and state the expected benefit.

    Timing: 8–15 minutes

  4. 4

    Test

    Select and test a concept

    Goal

    One concept receives a small test against its most critical assumption.

    Inputs for this step

    • Concept cards
    • Selection criteria and available means

    Actions

    • Compare concepts by contribution to the aim, feasibility and learning value.
    • Choose one concept and define test, owner, expected signal and date.

    Output

    Test assignment

    Concept · assumption · test · signal · owner

    Quality check

    Does the test examine the critical assumption rather than merely implement?

    Pitfall

    The most creative idea becomes an implementation project without comparison. Apply criteria and define a bounded learning step first.

    Timing: 5–10 minutes

05

Artifact

What comes out at the end

Sketch: what the artifact looks like

SCAMPER · Creativity TechniqueSystematically vary an existing product, service, or process through seven thinking operations
SCAMPERThe visual shows a starting object, seven SCAMPER triggers, and a condensed idea shortlist derived from them.Think existing things systematically differentlySCAMPER uses seven short thinking operations to generate variants and new concepts.askcondenseStarting objectexisting service or processS SubstitutereplaceC CombinecombineA AdaptadaptM ModifymagnifyP Put to useuse differentlyE EliminateremoveR ReversereverseShortlistcombine and teststrong variations
Form

Completed seven-operator matrix, bundled concept cards and a test assignment for one critical assumption.

Versioning / ownership

Record baseline version, date and constraints; append tested variations with result and follow-up date.

Tool alternatives
  • Paper matrix with seven rows
  • Digital whiteboard with operator areas
  • Concept cards for the shortlist

scamper-working-template.md

Prepare the whole flow or one selected phase with real inputs.

SCAMPER: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Complete SCAMPER pass Time: 30–60 minutes

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: SCAMPER matrix, cards, pens, a description or model of the current solution and a timer.
  • Roles: Facilitator, two to ten people with usage, domain or delivery perspectives; one person documents.
  • Advance information: Gather the current flow, relevant user signals, technical or regulatory constraints and known variants.
  • Overall time needed: 30–60 minutes
  • Setup: Prepare seven operator rows and keep the starting object visible. Park evaluation until the ideation pass is complete.

Prepare for the work steps

Baseline: Define the object and aim

  • Existing solution
  • Observed problem or aim

Operators: Apply seven change operators

  • SCAMPER brief
  • Seven operator questions

Concepts: Combine variations into concepts

  • Variation pool
  • Aim and constraints

Test: Select and test a concept

  • Concept cards
  • Selection criteria and available means

SCAMPER

OperatorYour variationsExpected benefit and critical check
S · Substitute
C · Combine
A · Adapt
M · Modify
P · Put to another use
E · Eliminate
R · Reverse / Rearrange
  • S · Substitute: Which component can be replaced by something better?
  • C · Combine: Which elements create more value together?
  • A · Adapt: Which proven solution from another context fits here?
  • M · Modify: What can be enlarged, reduced or reweighted?
  • P · Put to another use: What additional use can an existing component serve?
  • E · Eliminate: What can disappear without loss?
  • R · Reverse / Rearrange: Which sequence or relationship can be reversed?

Capture several variations and their expected benefit per operator; cluster and select afterward.

Bob Eberle · SCAMPER

Baseline: Define the object and aim

Expected artifact: SCAMPER brief

Object · user · aim · constraints

Entry:

...

  • Is it clear which concrete component may be varied?

Operators: Apply seven change operators

Expected artifact: Variation pool

S · C · A · M · P · E · R

Entry:

...

  • Does every operator produce at least one distinct variation?

Concepts: Combine variations into concepts

Expected artifact: Concept cards

Combination · benefit · assumption

Entry:

...

  • Is each concept more than a renamed single idea?

Test: Select and test a concept

Expected artifact: Test assignment

Concept · assumption · test · signal · owner

Entry:

...

  • Does the test examine the critical assumption rather than merely implement?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/scamper/run-sheet

06

Example output

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.

scamper-beispiel.md

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example: course portal

Substitute: Replace the printed starter pack with guided in-app onboarding. Combine: Combine course selection with a learning-goal check. Eliminate: Remove mandatory profile setup before the first course. Reverse: Start with a sample task, explanation afterward.

Concept: “Learn immediately” combines Eliminate and Reverse. Test: Five new users start with the sample task; the signal is whether four reach the first lesson without help.

07

Pitfalls

Recognize symptoms and steer against them

Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow

  1. Define the object and aimThe group tries to transform an abstract problem without an existing solution.View in phase
  2. Apply seven change operatorsThe group repeats the same favorite idea under several letters.View in phase
  3. Combine variations into conceptsThe shortlist contains loose thoughts without a recognizable use scenario.View in phase
  4. Select and test a conceptThe most creative idea becomes an implementation project without comparison.View in phase
08

Stop criteria

When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach

There is no concrete starting object.
Several operators only reproduce the same idea.
Constraints are used to stop ideation prematurely.
Concepts do not connect to the improvement aim.
Selection jumps directly to implementation without an assumption test.

Where to go next?

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting

Condenses the resulting variant matrix into a prioritized selection.

Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix

Selects the matching test format for the prioritized concept from several MVP types.

View in playbookDevelop and Select IdeasMove from a stuck solution view through an expanded solution space to a prioritized selection of ideas.

Finished the method guide?

Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

Go to profileMore methods