A relevant past situation and voluntary participation.
Opportunity Interview
A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Clarify product outcome and exploration area internally.
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Open guide, notes, optional agreed recording.
Participant, interviewer, quiet note-taker.
Recruit someone with a recent relevant experience.
20–30 minutes conversation, 15 minutes synthesis; repeat according to learning needs.
Choose a quiet setting; prepare an open story invitation and an event timeline for notes. Keep note-taking separate from interviewing.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Which needs emerge from a specific lived situation?
Flow
Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall
An Opportunity Interview collects specific past experiences to discover unmet needs, obstacles and desires in context. The story provides leads for further discovery.
Opportunity Interview· worksheet
Fictional example
An Opportunity Interview collects specific past experiences to discover unmet needs, obstacles and desires in context. The story provides leads for further discovery.
Context and story anchor
Which participant, relevant event and consent? Avoid unnecessary identifying data.
Fictional participant P03 searched for an evening course on Tuesday. Voluntary conversation; notes only agreed. Opening: invite the story of that last search.
Event sequence
Record trigger, actual steps, decisions and outcome.
After a shift-pattern change, P03 opened three course pages, copied times onto paper and called about an unclear end date. No enrolment followed yet.
Opportunities with evidence
Record need, scene and participant statement separately from interpretation.
Opportunity: compare every session with changing shifts. Evidence: times were copied and supplemented by phone. Team interpretation: individual pages hinder comparison; still untested.
Contrasts and follow-up
Which open questions, contrasting cases and further interviews would help?
Next contrast: someone with regular working hours. It remains unclear whether missing dates or shift changes were decisive. No frequency claim from P03.
All example details are fictional and illustrate the application.
- 1
Opening
Opening

Goal
Story anchor
Inputs for this step
- Recruiting and learning frame
Actions
- Clarify purpose, voluntary participation and recording; select a recent relevant event.
- Avoid offering hypothetical scenarios that steer the story.
Output
Story anchor
Has a specific event been selected?
Quality check
Has a specific event been selected?
Pitfall
The team presents its new idea. Set aside the idea and ask about the last situation.
Timing: 5 minutes
- 2
Story
Story

Goal
Event sequence
Inputs for this step
- Selected experience
Actions
- Let the person recount trigger, steps, decisions and outcome chronologically.
- Return from generalisations to that moment; ask about people, tools and context.
Output
Event sequence
Can actions and context be reconstructed?
Quality check
Can actions and context be reconstructed?
Pitfall
The guide interrupts every revealing detour. Follow the story and fill gaps afterwards.
Timing: 10–15 minutes
- 3
Probing
Probing

Goal
Need evidence
Inputs for this step
- Turning points in the story
Actions
- At specific turning points, ask about goal, obstacle, response and significance.
- Use open probes; document feelings as reported, without inventing them.
Output
Need evidence
Is each need tied to a scene?
Quality check
Is each need tied to a scene?
Pitfall
A feature request is accepted as a need. Ask about the occasion and desired progress.
Timing: 5–10 minutes
- 4
Snapshot
Snapshot

Goal
Interview snapshot
Inputs for this step
- Notes and permissions
Actions
- Summarise facts, quotes, interpretations and open questions separately.
- Record opportunities in customer language and link the scene; select further cases by knowledge gaps.
Output
Interview snapshot
Is each opportunity traceable?
Quality check
Is each opportunity traceable?
Pitfall
One interview is treated as market-size evidence. Mark it as qualitative evidence and investigate other contexts.
Timing: 15 minutes
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Sketch: what the artifact looks like
Interview snapshot with event sequence, evidenced needs and open questions.
Record date and scope; retain the previous version and reason when changing it.
- Paper notes and event timeline
- Shared interview snapshot
- Recording only by agreement
opportunity-interview-working-template.md
Recruit someone with a recent relevant experience.
Opportunity Interview: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Complete cycle Time: 20–30 minutes conversation, 15 minutes synthesis; repeat according to learning needs.
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Open guide, notes, optional agreed recording.
- Roles: Participant, interviewer, quiet note-taker.
- Advance information: Recruit someone with a recent relevant experience.
- Overall time needed: 20–30 minutes conversation, 15 minutes synthesis; repeat according to learning needs.
- Setup: Choose a quiet setting; prepare an open story invitation and an event timeline for notes. Keep note-taking separate from interviewing.
Prepare for the work steps
Opening: Opening
- Recruiting and learning frame
Story: Story
- Selected experience
Probing: Probing
- Turning points in the story
Snapshot: Snapshot
- Notes and permissions
Opportunity Interview· worksheet
Context and story anchor
Which participant, relevant event and consent? Avoid unnecessary identifying data.
...
Event sequence
Record trigger, actual steps, decisions and outcome.
...
Opportunities with evidence
Record need, scene and participant statement separately from interpretation.
...
Contrasts and follow-up
Which open questions, contrasting cases and further interviews would help?
...
Answer the prompts with your own information. Explicitly mark unknowns and assumptions.
Teresa Torres: Story-Based Customer Interviews
Opening: Opening
Expected artifact: Story anchor
Has a specific event been selected?
Entry:
...
- Has a specific event been selected?
Story: Story
Expected artifact: Event sequence
Can actions and context be reconstructed?
Entry:
...
- Can actions and context be reconstructed?
Probing: Probing
Expected artifact: Need evidence
Is each need tied to a scene?
Entry:
...
- Is each need tied to a scene?
Snapshot: Snapshot
Expected artifact: Interview snapshot
Is each opportunity traceable?
Entry:
...
- Is each opportunity traceable?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/opportunity-interview/run-sheet
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.
opportunity-interview-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example
Context and story anchor: Fictional participant P03 searched for an evening course on Tuesday. Voluntary conversation; notes only agreed. Opening: invite the story of that last search.
Event sequence: After a shift-pattern change, P03 opened three course pages, copied times onto paper and called about an unclear end date. No enrolment followed yet.
Opportunities with evidence: Opportunity: compare every session with changing shifts. Evidence: times were copied and supplemented by phone. Team interpretation: individual pages hinder comparison; still untested.
Contrasts and follow-up: Next contrast: someone with regular working hours. It remains unclear whether missing dates or shift changes were decisive. No frequency claim from P03.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow
- OpeningThe team presents its new idea.View in phase
- StoryThe guide interrupts every revealing detour.View in phase
- ProbingA feature request is accepted as a need.View in phase
- SnapshotOne interview is treated as market-size evidence.View in phase
Opening
The team presents its new idea.
Set aside the idea and ask about the last situation.
Story
The guide interrupts every revealing detour.
Follow the story and fill gaps afterwards.
Probing
A feature request is accepted as a need.
Ask about the occasion and desired progress.
Snapshot
One interview is treated as market-size evidence.
Mark it as qualitative evidence and investigate other contexts.
Stop criteria
When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach
Finished the method guide?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

