methodatlas
Method guideOperations

MORT Analysis

A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.

ComplexityHigh
TimeMehrere Tage bis Wochen
Participants2-6
FormatWorkshop + async
MaturityEstablished
Plan MORT Analysis
01

Prerequisite

What needs to be finished first

Complete firstBounded subject

The scope and purpose of MORT Analysis are stated as a concrete question.

Without scope, MORT investigation record becomes arbitrary.
Complete firstAccess to relevant perspectives

secured event chronology, interviews and artefacts, MORT diagram and definitions manual and domain decision makers are available.

Without these perspectives, central claims in MORT investigation record remain unsupported.
02

Preparation

What needs to be ready before start

Materials

secured event chronology, interviews and artefacts, MORT diagram and definitions manual, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.

People / roles

Lead investigator · safety/domain experts · worker representatives · management liaison

Pre-read

Collect secured event chronology, interviews and artefacts, MORT diagram and definitions manual in advance and mark open assumptions.

Time needed

Several days to weeks

Setup

Prepare MORT tree with evidence-based branch assessment and causal linkage visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.

03

Core question

The one question this method answers

Which barrier, task, and management factors enabled or failed to prevent the event?

04

Flow

Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall

MORT is a comprehensive fault tree for events and management systems. Analysts test branches against evidence and mark adequate, less-than-adequate, or not applicable.

MORT investigation record

Fictional worked example

MORT tree with evidence-based branch assessment and causal linkage as a precise working structure with a fictional example.

Top event

Event · loss · boundary

Pump damage, six-hour shutdown.

MORT branch

Path · definition · status

Bypass control: LTA.

Evidence

Source · finding · uncertainty

Register without owner; interview + document.

Correction

System change · owner · effectiveness test

Bypass tag + review; audit after 30 days.

The example demonstrates the domain logic of MORT Analysis; worksheets remain blank.

U.S. Department of Energy: MORT User's Manual

  1. 1

    Establish event

    Establish event

    Goal

    Produce event basis so the core question “Which barrier, task, and management factors enabled or failed to prevent the event?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • secured event chronology
    • interviews and artefacts
    • MORT diagram and definitions manual

    Actions

    • Secure top event, losses, chronology, and scope.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in event basis.

    Output

    event basis

    event basis · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Are facts, statements, and interpretation separated?

    Pitfall

    MORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope. Stabilise chronology and evidence register first, prioritise branches, and use unknown rather than invented ratings.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

  2. 2

    Select branches

    Select branches

    Goal

    Produce analysis tree so the core question “Which barrier, task, and management factors enabled or failed to prevent the event?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • event basis
    • interviews and artefacts
    • MORT diagram and definitions manual

    Actions

    • Select relevant barrier, task, and management branches.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in analysis tree.

    Output

    analysis tree

    analysis tree · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Is every branch defined through the manual?

    Pitfall

    MORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope. Stabilise chronology and evidence register first, prioritise branches, and use unknown rather than invented ratings.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

  3. 3

    Evaluate

    Evaluate

    Goal

    Produce rated MORT so the core question “Which barrier, task, and management factors enabled or failed to prevent the event?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • analysis tree
    • interviews and artefacts
    • MORT diagram and definitions manual

    Actions

    • Rate branches as adequate, LTA, N/A, or unknown with evidence.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in rated MORT.

    Output

    rated MORT

    rated MORT · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Does every rating have a source and rationale?

    Pitfall

    MORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope. Stabilise chronology and evidence register first, prioritise branches, and use unknown rather than invented ratings.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

  4. 4

    Correct system

    Correct system

    Goal

    Produce corrective plan so the core question “Which barrier, task, and management factors enabled or failed to prevent the event?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • rated MORT
    • interviews and artefacts
    • MORT diagram and definitions manual

    Actions

    • Cluster causal paths and verify systemic corrections.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in corrective plan.

    Output

    corrective plan

    corrective plan · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Do actions address barrier and management system?

    Pitfall

    MORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope. Stabilise chronology and evidence register first, prioritise branches, and use unknown rather than invented ratings.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

05

Artifact

What comes out at the end

Sketch: what the artifact looks like

MORT Analysis · Management- und Kontrollversagen systematisch prüfenEreignis, Fakten und MORT-Referenzbaum nutzen, um spezifische Kontrollen und Management-Oversight strukturiert zu bewerten
MORT AnalysisDas Visual zeigt ein Ereignis, einen MORT-Referenzbaum mit Specific Controls und Management Oversight sowie Findings und Systemmaßnahmen.Vorfall gegen einen Standardbaum systematisch prüfenMORT trennt spezifische Kontrollen von Management-Oversight, damit Findings vollständig und nachvollziehbar werden.EreignisSchaden und UntersuchungsumfangMORT-ReferenzbaumLoss EventTop EventSpecific ControlsBarrieren, Kontrollen,EnergiepfadManagement OversightPlanung, Standards, Reviewunzureichend, fehlend oder nicht anwendbar markierenFindings je ZweigEvidenz, Lücke, offene FrageSystemmaßnahmenKontrollen und ManagementsystemstärkenFakten gegenStandardbaum prüfenKnoten für Knotensystemisch ableiten
Form

Versioned MORT investigation record with date, sources, owners, and next review.

Versioning / ownership

Retain date, source, assumption state, and decision for every version of MORT investigation record.

Tool alternatives
  • MORT investigation record as board or document
  • Source and evidence register
  • Decision and action log

mort-analysis-working-template.md

Plan MORT Analysis around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.

MORT Analysis: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Full initiative Time: Several days to weeks

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: secured event chronology, interviews and artefacts, MORT diagram and definitions manual, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
  • Roles: Lead investigator · safety/domain experts · worker representatives · management liaison
  • Advance information: Collect secured event chronology, interviews and artefacts, MORT diagram and definitions manual in advance and mark open assumptions.
  • Overall time needed: Several days to weeks
  • Setup: Prepare MORT tree with evidence-based branch assessment and causal linkage visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.

Prepare for the work steps

Establish event: Establish event

  • secured event chronology
  • interviews and artefacts
  • MORT diagram and definitions manual

Select branches: Select branches

  • event basis
  • interviews and artefacts
  • MORT diagram and definitions manual

Evaluate: Evaluate

  • analysis tree
  • interviews and artefacts
  • MORT diagram and definitions manual

Correct system: Correct system

  • rated MORT
  • interviews and artefacts
  • MORT diagram and definitions manual

MORT investigation record

Top event

Event · loss · boundary

...

MORT branch

Path · definition · status

...

Evidence

Source · finding · uncertainty

...

Correction

System change · owner · effectiveness test

...

Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.

U.S. Department of Energy: MORT User's Manual

Establish event: Establish event

Expected artifact: event basis

event basis · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Are facts, statements, and interpretation separated?

Select branches: Select branches

Expected artifact: analysis tree

analysis tree · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Is every branch defined through the manual?

Evaluate: Evaluate

Expected artifact: rated MORT

rated MORT · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Does every rating have a source and rationale?

Correct system: Correct system

Expected artifact: corrective plan

corrective plan · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Do actions address barrier and management system?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/mort-analysis/run-sheet

06

Example output

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.

mort-analysis-beispiel.md

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Top event: pump damage and six-hour shutdown. Barrier: interlock bypassed during maintenance without a visible tag. Task: restart check lacked a removal step. Management: bypass register had no owner or review. Corrections address tagging, check, and governance; individual blame is not treated as the system cause.

07

Pitfalls

Recognize symptoms and steer against them

Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow

  1. Establish eventMORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope.View in phase
  2. Select branchesMORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope.View in phase
  3. EvaluateMORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope.View in phase
  4. Correct systemMORT branches are rated from conjecture or completed without a risk-relevant scope.View in phase
08

Stop criteria

When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach

MORT investigation record answers the core question with traceable evidence or explicitly marked uncertainty.
Owners, next actions, and review dates are named for open points.

Finished the method guide?

Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.