A defined target state or measurable outcome is available against which the current state can be assessed.
GAP Analysis
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Workshop board or spreadsheet with columns Current State, Desired State, Gap, Cause, Impact, Action, Owner; existing KPIs, process data, and strategy goals.
Facilitator; business owner for the target state; 2-8 people with knowledge of the current state; decision maker for action prioritization.
Scope, target state, current data, known initiatives, constraints, and decision on which gaps should be addressed.
1-3 h
Make scope visible and limit it. Fix the target state before collecting gaps. Formulate each gap as an observable difference.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Which gaps between current state and target state prevent the outcome, and which actions close them effectively?
Flow
Marker: Phase
| Step | Duration | Action | Hint |
|---|---|---|---|
1Scope and target state | 20 min | Define the investigation scope and desired state with measurable criteria. | A target like "get better" is not enough. Name target values or concrete capabilities. |
2Capture current state | 30-45 min | Describe the current state with data, examples, and observable facts. | Do not gather solutions first. First check whether everyone sees the same current state. |
3Formulate gaps | 30 min | Document differences between current and desired state as individual gap entries. | A gap is not a measure. "Implement CRM" is a solution, "no central customer view" is a gap. |
4Assess causes and impact | 30-45 min | For each gap, clarify cause, effect, urgency, and dependencies. | High pain without root cause leads to symbolic measures. Validate the cause at least at a basic level. |
5Derive actions | 30 min | Set actions, owner, deadline, and success signal for prioritized gaps. | Do not close all gaps at once. Explicitly account for capacity. |
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Gap matrix with current state, target state, gap, cause, impact, priority, action, owner, deadline, and success criterion.
Store the matrix with date and scope. When the target state changes, create a new version and mark old gaps as completed, dropped, or superseded.
- Miro or FigJam
- Google Sheets or Excel
- Confluence table
- Notion database
gap-analysis-working-template.md
Compact working template for Gap Analysis with current state, target state, gaps, causes, and actions.
Gap Analysis Working Template
Goal
Compare the current state with the target state and derive the most important gaps.
Context
When and for what do we use this method?
Input
Which data, observations, decisions, or materials are available?
Working area
- Current state:
- Target state:
- Gaps:
- Causes:
- Priorities:
Output artifacts
- Gap list:
- Action options:
- Prioritized next steps:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, and success signal.
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
gap-analysis-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
GAP Analysis - Self-Service Support
Target state Q3/2026: 35 % fewer tickets about standard questions. Current State: 1,240 tickets per month, 42 % are about billing and login. The help center is visited by only 11 % of users.
| Gap | Cause | Impact | Action | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No discoverable billing articles | Articles not linked with search terms | 310 tickets per month | Add top-20 search terms | Jana |
| Login errors without a self-service path | Error message without reset link | 210 tickets per month | Add reset flow on error page | Amir |
Priority: Billing articles first because implementation is possible in 5 days and effect is directly measurable.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Target state is unclear
The discussion revolves around personal expectations.
Define the desired state with measurable criteria or observable capabilities.
Solution as a gap
Entries are labeled "buy a tool" or "increase headcount."
Ask again: Which gap in the current state should this solution close?
Scope is too broad
The matrix covers strategy, process, people, and technology at the same time.
Limit scope to one process, capability area, or outcome.
No cause analysis
Actions address symptoms, and gaps reappear later.
For top gaps, document at least one cause hypothesis and evidence.
Actions without owner
The gap list is stored as a report and no follow-up happens.
Accept no action without owner, deadline, and success signal.
Stop criteria
Done signals checkable in under a minute
Finished the runsheet?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.