methodatlas
RunsheetBusiness Strategy

GAP Analysis

ComplexityMedium
Time1-3 h
Participants2-8
FormatWorkshop + async
MaturityCanonical
01

Prerequisite

What needs to be finished first

Complete firstTarget Statenot in catalog

A defined target state or measurable outcome is available against which the current state can be assessed.

Without: Without a target state, every deviation becomes opinion-based and the action list becomes arbitrary.
02

Preparation

What needs to be ready before start

Materials

Workshop board or spreadsheet with columns Current State, Desired State, Gap, Cause, Impact, Action, Owner; existing KPIs, process data, and strategy goals.

People / roles

Facilitator; business owner for the target state; 2-8 people with knowledge of the current state; decision maker for action prioritization.

Pre-read

Scope, target state, current data, known initiatives, constraints, and decision on which gaps should be addressed.

Time needed

1-3 h

Setup

Make scope visible and limit it. Fix the target state before collecting gaps. Formulate each gap as an observable difference.

03

Core question

The one question this method answers

Which gaps between current state and target state prevent the outcome, and which actions close them effectively?

04

Flow

Marker: Phase

StepDurationActionHint
1Scope and target state
20 minDefine the investigation scope and desired state with measurable criteria.A target like "get better" is not enough. Name target values or concrete capabilities.
2Capture current state
30-45 minDescribe the current state with data, examples, and observable facts.Do not gather solutions first. First check whether everyone sees the same current state.
3Formulate gaps
30 minDocument differences between current and desired state as individual gap entries.A gap is not a measure. "Implement CRM" is a solution, "no central customer view" is a gap.
4Assess causes and impact
30-45 minFor each gap, clarify cause, effect, urgency, and dependencies.High pain without root cause leads to symbolic measures. Validate the cause at least at a basic level.
5Derive actions
30 minSet actions, owner, deadline, and success signal for prioritized gaps.Do not close all gaps at once. Explicitly account for capacity.
05

Artifact

What comes out at the end

Form

Gap matrix with current state, target state, gap, cause, impact, priority, action, owner, deadline, and success criterion.

Versioning / ownership

Store the matrix with date and scope. When the target state changes, create a new version and mark old gaps as completed, dropped, or superseded.

Tool alternatives
  • Miro or FigJam
  • Google Sheets or Excel
  • Confluence table
  • Notion database

gap-analysis-working-template.md

Compact working template for Gap Analysis with current state, target state, gaps, causes, and actions.

Gap Analysis Working Template

Goal

Compare the current state with the target state and derive the most important gaps.

Context

When and for what do we use this method?

Input

Which data, observations, decisions, or materials are available?

Working area

  • Current state:
  • Target state:
  • Gaps:
  • Causes:
  • Priorities:

Output artifacts

  • Gap list:
  • Action options:
  • Prioritized next steps:

Open questions

  • ...

Next step

Owner, date, and success signal.

06

Example output

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

gap-analysis-beispiel.md

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

GAP Analysis - Self-Service Support

Target state Q3/2026: 35 % fewer tickets about standard questions. Current State: 1,240 tickets per month, 42 % are about billing and login. The help center is visited by only 11 % of users.

GapCauseImpactActionOwner
No discoverable billing articlesArticles not linked with search terms310 tickets per monthAdd top-20 search termsJana
Login errors without a self-service pathError message without reset link210 tickets per monthAdd reset flow on error pageAmir

Priority: Billing articles first because implementation is possible in 5 days and effect is directly measurable.

07

Pitfalls

Recognize symptoms and steer against them

Trap

Target state is unclear

Symptom

The discussion revolves around personal expectations.

What to do

Define the desired state with measurable criteria or observable capabilities.

Trap

Solution as a gap

Symptom

Entries are labeled "buy a tool" or "increase headcount."

What to do

Ask again: Which gap in the current state should this solution close?

Trap

Scope is too broad

Symptom

The matrix covers strategy, process, people, and technology at the same time.

What to do

Limit scope to one process, capability area, or outcome.

Trap

No cause analysis

Symptom

Actions address symptoms, and gaps reappear later.

What to do

For top gaps, document at least one cause hypothesis and evidence.

Trap

Actions without owner

Symptom

The gap list is stored as a report and no follow-up happens.

What to do

Accept no action without owner, deadline, and success signal.

08

Stop criteria

Done signals checkable in under a minute

No target state is available.
Current state cannot be described with facts or examples.
Scope is so broad that no actions can be derived.
No decision maker for prioritization is available.
The team is looking for new ideas, not gaps against a target state.

Finished the runsheet?

Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.