methodatlas
Method guideBusiness Strategy

GAP Analysis

A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.

ComplexityMedium
Time1-3 h
Participants2-8
FormatWorkshop + async
MaturityCanonical
Plan the work
01

Prerequisite

What needs to be finished first

Complete firstClear working frame

Choose target, time basis, system boundary and the person who can decide a change.

Without a bounded question or checkable evidence, the result will be unclear.
02

Preparation

What needs to be ready before start

Materials

Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

People / roles

Goal owner · data/process owner · affected delivery team.

Pre-read

Choose materials, data access and participants to fit the research or decision question.

Time needed

60–180 minutes for a prepared comparison; data collection and implementation are separate.

Setup

Open the method-specific structure. Fictional examples are for orientation only; keep the blank worksheet separate from actual findings.

03

Core question

The one question this method answers

Which evidence-based gap blocks the target, and what action could close it measurably?

04

Flow

Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall

Gap Analysis compares an evidence-based current state with an operationalized target state to derive gaps and testable actions. Quality depends on comparable definitions and sound baseline data.

Gap Analysis working record

Fictional example

Do not calculate a numeric gap when measures or time bases differ.

Target state

What outcome, unit and time horizon define the target?

Agreed support coverage during defined opening hours.

Current state

Which current measure and source apply to the same scope?

Roster data not yet available; do not fill a number.

Gap

What comparable difference is supported by evidence?

Unknown until current coverage is measured.

Next action

Who will close or investigate the gap and when?

Operations measures demand by time of day before recommending a shift change.

Do not calculate a numeric gap when measures or time bases differ.

Gap Analysis overview | Asana

  1. 1

    Target

    Set target and current state

    Goal

    Use the same unit and time basis for both.

    Inputs for this step

    • Choose target, time basis, system boundary and the person who can decide a change.
    • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

    Actions

    • Define target, time, boundary and decision owner; source the current state.
    • Record Comparable target and baseline with its evidence status, source or open verification need.

    Output

    Comparable target and baseline

    Comparable target and baseline

    Quality check

    Are target and current measures comparable?

    Pitfall

    Vague vision is compared with unknown current state. Define metric and measure before action planning.

    Timing: About 10–20 minutes; schedule data or clarification work separately.

  2. 2

    Gap

    Assess gaps and cause hypotheses

    Goal

    State data quality and uncertainty.

    Inputs for this step

    • Comparable target and baseline
    • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

    Actions

    • Quantify only with comparable data; separate observed gap from possible cause.
    • Record Gap with evidence status with its evidence status, source or open verification need.

    Output

    Gap with evidence status

    Gap with evidence status

    Quality check

    Can each gap be reproduced?

    Pitfall

    Cause is inferred from difference alone. Test cause with further analysis.

    Timing: About 10–20 minutes; schedule data or clarification work separately.

  3. 3

    Actions

    Prioritize actions

    Goal

    Treat actions as hypotheses where causes remain uncertain.

    Inputs for this step

    • Gap with evidence status
    • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

    Actions

    • Define targeted actions with expected effect, effort, owner and dependencies.
    • Record Prioritized actions and questions with its evidence status, source or open verification need.

    Output

    Prioritized actions and questions

    Prioritized actions and questions

    Quality check

    Does action address an evidenced gap?

    Pitfall

    Solution is chosen before cause is understood. Investigate first and mark assumptions.

    Timing: About 10–20 minutes; schedule data or clarification work separately.

  4. 4

    Review

    Assign ownership and review

    Goal

    Define a rule for adjusting or stopping.

    Inputs for this step

    • Prioritized actions and questions
    • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

    Actions

    • Set owner, measure, source and review date for each action.
    • Record Actionable review plan with its evidence status, source or open verification need.

    Output

    Actionable review plan

    Actionable review plan

    Quality check

    Can progress and effect be checked?

    Pitfall

    One-time analysis has no follow-up. Schedule review and change criteria.

    Timing: About 10–20 minutes; schedule data or clarification work separately.

05

Artifact

What comes out at the end

Sketch: what the artifact looks like

Gap Analysis · Current vs. TargetCompare current state and target picture, name the gap, and derive prioritized actions
GAP AnalysisThe visual shows current state, target state, gap, causes, and prioritized actions.Work from the current state toward the target stateThe gap is not only named, but translated into causes, priorities, and actions.differenceclosecausesprioritizeCurrent stateslow releases, patchy monitoring,uncertain recoveryGapcapabilities, data, and accountabilityare missingTarget statefrequent releases, clear quality, fastrecoveryCause Amanual handoffsCause Bunclear ownersActionsdefine roadmap, owner, sequence, and success criterion
Form

Versioned record of question, evidence, result, uncertainty, owners and next review date.

Versioning / ownership

Track date, scope, sources, assumptions and changes; assign an owner and review for ongoing practice or initiatives.

Tool alternatives
  • Paper and pens
  • Whiteboard or simple table

gap-analysis-working-template.md

Plan a session or initiative to match the actual scope of work.

GAP Analysis: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Prepare the full method Time: 60–180 minutes for a prepared comparison; data collection and implementation are separate.

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.
  • Roles: Goal owner · data/process owner · affected delivery team.
  • Advance information: Choose materials, data access and participants to fit the research or decision question.
  • Overall time needed: 60–180 minutes for a prepared comparison; data collection and implementation are separate.
  • Setup: Open the method-specific structure. Fictional examples are for orientation only; keep the blank worksheet separate from actual findings.

Prepare for the work steps

Target: Set target and current state

  • Choose target, time basis, system boundary and the person who can decide a change.
  • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

Gap: Assess gaps and cause hypotheses

  • Comparable target and baseline
  • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

Actions: Prioritize actions

  • Gap with evidence status
  • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

Review: Assign ownership and review

  • Prioritized actions and questions
  • Target criterion, current measurement, source, owner, dependencies and review date.

Gap Analysis working record

Target state

What outcome, unit and time horizon define the target?

...

Current state

Which current measure and source apply to the same scope?

...

Gap

What comparable difference is supported by evidence?

...

Next action

Who will close or investigate the gap and when?

...

Blank worksheet: prompts only; do not copy example data.

Gap Analysis overview | Asana

Target: Set target and current state

Expected artifact: Comparable target and baseline

Comparable target and baseline

Entry:

...

  • Are target and current measures comparable?

Gap: Assess gaps and cause hypotheses

Expected artifact: Gap with evidence status

Gap with evidence status

Entry:

...

  • Can each gap be reproduced?

Actions: Prioritize actions

Expected artifact: Prioritized actions and questions

Prioritized actions and questions

Entry:

...

  • Does action address an evidenced gap?

Review: Assign ownership and review

Expected artifact: Actionable review plan

Actionable review plan

Entry:

...

  • Can progress and effect be checked?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/gap-analysis/run-sheet

06

Example output

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.

gap-analysis-beispiel.md

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example: support coverage

Target: 40 support hours per week during defined opening hours.

Current: 32 support hours per week for the same opening hours and period.

Gap: 40 − 32 = 8 support hours per week. Values are fictional and demonstrate the comparison only.

Cause hypothesis: Demand and staffing may not align by time; check dated request and roster data first.

Action: Operations compares requests by time of day with staffing. The owner then decides whether to change shifts, process or target.

07

Pitfalls

Recognize symptoms and steer against them

Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow

  1. Set target and current stateVague vision is compared with unknown current state.View in phase
  2. Assess gaps and cause hypothesesCause is inferred from difference alone.View in phase
  3. Prioritize actionsSolution is chosen before cause is understood.View in phase
  4. Assign ownership and reviewOne-time analysis has no follow-up.View in phase
08

Stop criteria

When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach

If target definitions or baseline data are missing, clarify and measure first. Do not infer causes or target attainment from non-comparable data.

Method after Praxisgemeinschaft. The method emerged as a widespread practice and is not clearly attributed to a single originator or organization. Curated with 1 sources.

Sources: Gap Analysis overview | Asana

Flow, timeboxes, and pitfalls are editorially curated practice recommendations based on the listed sources.

Where to go next?

Paper scorecard with four perspectives, connected objective cards and columns for measures, targets and initiatives.
Business Strategy
Balanced Scorecard

Embeds the found gap into ongoing steering across perspectives.

Paper objective sheet with five SMART fields, baseline, target, owner, deadline and a complete result statement.
Product Strategy
SMART Goals

Formulates the prioritized measure as a concrete SMART goal with a deadline.

Finished the method guide?

Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

Go to profileMore methods