The scope and purpose of Five-Minute VC Check are stated as a concrete question.
5-Minuten VC-Check
A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Pitch and business model, market and traction data, team and financing plan and domain decision makers are available.
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Pitch and business model, market and traction data, team and financing plan, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
Founder · critical reviewer · finance/market expert
Collect Pitch and business model, market and traction data, team and financing plan in advance and mark open assumptions.
5-minute scan plus 25-minute follow-up
Prepare compact VC scan covering problem, solution, market, why now, competition, model, traction, and team visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Is the venture thesis understandable in five minutes, and where is decision-relevant evidence missing?
Flow
Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall
The check is a rapid investment-readiness scan. Each claim receives a number or evidence; open fields create due-diligence questions rather than invented confidence.
VC readiness card
Fictional worked example
compact VC scan covering problem, solution, market, why now, competition, model, traction, and team as a precise working structure with a fictional example.
Problem/solution
Problem/solution information to record
Regulierte Teams verlieren Reviewentscheidungen.
Market/advantage
Market/advantage information to record
18.000 DACH-Zielteams; Quelle dokumentiert.
Traction/model
Traction/model information to record
8 Piloten, 1.440 € MRR, 3-Monats-Kohorte.
Team/ask
Team/ask information to record
Pre-Seed Ask; CAC-Skalierung offen.
The example demonstrates the domain logic of Five-Minute VC Check; worksheets remain blank.
- 1
Thesis
Thesis

Goal
Produce venture thesis so the core question “Is the venture thesis understandable in five minutes, and where is decision-relevant evidence missing?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- Pitch and business model
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Actions
- Check problem, target customer, solution, and why now in one sentence.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in venture thesis.
Output
venture thesis
venture thesis · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Is the target customer specific?
Pitfall
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue. Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
- 2
Market
Market/advantage

Goal
Produce market case so the core question “Is the venture thesis understandable in five minutes, and where is decision-relevant evidence missing?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- venture thesis
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Actions
- Check reachable market, alternatives, and unfair advantage.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in market case.
Output
market case
market case · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Are market number and source defined?
Pitfall
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue. Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
- 3
Traction/model
Traction/model

Goal
Produce evidence snapshot so the core question “Is the venture thesis understandable in five minutes, and where is decision-relevant evidence missing?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- market case
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Actions
- Capture cohorts, revenue, retention, and unit economics.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in evidence snapshot.
Output
evidence snapshot
evidence snapshot · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Are vanity metrics excluded?
Pitfall
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue. Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
- 4
Team/questions
Team/questions

Goal
Produce VC questions so the core question “Is the venture thesis understandable in five minutes, and where is decision-relevant evidence missing?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- evidence snapshot
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Actions
- Name founder-market fit, ask, and open due diligence.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in VC questions.
Output
VC questions
VC questions · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Do unknowns remain visible?
Pitfall
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue. Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Sketch: what the artifact looks like
Versioned VC readiness card with date, sources, owners, and next review.
Retain date, source, assumption state, and decision for every version of VC readiness card.
- VC readiness card as board or document
- Source and evidence register
- Decision and action log
five-minute-vc-check-working-template.md
Plan Five-Minute VC Check around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.
5-Minuten VC-Check: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Establish and review the practice Time: 5-minute scan plus 25-minute follow-up
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Pitch and business model, market and traction data, team and financing plan, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
- Roles: Founder · critical reviewer · finance/market expert
- Advance information: Collect Pitch and business model, market and traction data, team and financing plan in advance and mark open assumptions.
- Overall time needed: 5-minute scan plus 25-minute follow-up
- Setup: Prepare compact VC scan covering problem, solution, market, why now, competition, model, traction, and team visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.
Prepare for the work steps
Thesis: Thesis
- Pitch and business model
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Market: Market/advantage
- venture thesis
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Traction/model: Traction/model
- market case
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
Team/questions: Team/questions
- evidence snapshot
- market and traction data
- team and financing plan
VC readiness card
Problem/solution
Problem/solution information to record
...
Market/advantage
Market/advantage information to record
...
Traction/model
Traction/model information to record
...
Team/ask
Team/ask information to record
...
Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.
Sequoia Capital: Writing a Business Plan
Thesis: Thesis
Expected artifact: venture thesis
venture thesis · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Is the target customer specific?
Market: Market/advantage
Expected artifact: market case
market case · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Are market number and source defined?
Traction/model: Traction/model
Expected artifact: evidence snapshot
evidence snapshot · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Are vanity metrics excluded?
Team/questions: Team/questions
Expected artifact: VC questions
VC questions · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Do unknowns remain visible?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/five-minute-vc-check/run-sheet
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.
five-minute-vc-check-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Problem: regulated teams lose decisions. Market: 18,000 target teams in DACH, source named. Traction: eight paying pilots, €1,440 MRR, three-month cohort. Model: €180/team/month. Open question: CAC only from founder sales, so no scaled evidence.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow
- ThesisTAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.View in phase
- Market/advantageTAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.View in phase
- Traction/modelTAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.View in phase
- Team/questionsTAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.View in phase
Thesis
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.
Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Market/advantage
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.
Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Traction/model
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.
Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Team/questions
TAM, logos, or waitlists replace reachable market, retention, and recurring revenue.
Add definition, period, and source to every number; carry unknowns as due-diligence questions.
Stop criteria
When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach
Finished the method guide?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

