methodatlas
Method guideInnovation

Double Diamond

A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.

ComplexityMedium
TimeWochen bis Monate
Participants3-12
FormatWorkshop + async
MaturityCanonical
Plan Double Diamond
01

Prerequisite

What needs to be finished first

Complete firstBounded subject

The scope and purpose of Double Diamond are stated as a concrete question.

Without scope, double diamond evidence trail becomes arbitrary.
Complete firstAccess to relevant perspectives

Challenge and constraints, access to affected people, decision and test capacity and domain decision makers are available.

Without these perspectives, central claims in double diamond evidence trail remain unsupported.
02

Preparation

What needs to be ready before start

Materials

Challenge and constraints, access to affected people, decision and test capacity, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.

People / roles

Design/Research · Product · domain · Delivery · sponsor

Pre-read

Collect Challenge and constraints, access to affected people, decision and test capacity in advance and mark open assumptions.

Time needed

Several days to months

Setup

Prepare two divergence-convergence cycles across problem and solution spaces visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.

03

Core question

The one question this method answers

Which problem matters to whom, and which tested solution addresses it effectively?

04

Flow

Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall

The four phases are not a linear gate process. Teams diverge and converge repeatedly, work people-centred, collaboratively and iteratively, and test the problem as well as solutions.

double diamond evidence trail

Fictional worked example

two divergence-convergence cycles across problem and solution spaces as a precise working structure with a fictional example.

Discover evidence

Discover evidence information to record

18 beobachtete Übergaben.

Defined challenge

Defined challenge information to record

Uneinheitliche Zusammenfassung verursacht Verlust.

Develop options

Develop options information to record

Drei Zusammenfassungsmodelle getestet.

Deliver outcome

Deliver outcome information to record

Rückfragen 34 % → 16 %, Accessibility Guardrail.

The example demonstrates the domain logic of Double Diamond; worksheets remain blank.

Design Council: Double Diamond

  1. 1

    Discover

    Discover

    Goal

    Produce research evidence so the core question “Which problem matters to whom, and which tested solution addresses it effectively?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • Challenge and constraints
    • access to affected people
    • decision and test capacity

    Actions

    • Explore the problem space broadly with people, data, and context.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in research evidence.

    Output

    research evidence

    research evidence · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Does research include conflicting perspectives?

    Pitfall

    A preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space. Reopen the problem space, seek disconfirming evidence, and make convergence criteria visible.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

  2. 2

    Define

    Define

    Goal

    Produce defined challenge so the core question “Which problem matters to whom, and which tested solution addresses it effectively?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • research evidence
    • access to affected people
    • decision and test capacity

    Actions

    • Synthesize patterns and focus an evidenced challenge.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in defined challenge.

    Output

    defined challenge

    defined challenge · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Is the problem definition solution-neutral?

    Pitfall

    A preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space. Reopen the problem space, seek disconfirming evidence, and make convergence criteria visible.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

  3. 3

    Develop

    Develop

    Goal

    Produce tested options so the core question “Which problem matters to whom, and which tested solution addresses it effectively?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • defined challenge
    • access to affected people
    • decision and test capacity

    Actions

    • Generate, prototype, and compare several solution directions.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in tested options.

    Output

    tested options

    tested options · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Do tests create decision-ready learning?

    Pitfall

    A preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space. Reopen the problem space, seek disconfirming evidence, and make convergence criteria visible.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

  4. 4

    Deliver

    Deliver

    Goal

    Produce delivery evidence so the core question “Which problem matters to whom, and which tested solution addresses it effectively?” can be answered with stronger support.

    Inputs for this step

    • tested options
    • access to affected people
    • decision and test capacity

    Actions

    • Pilot, measure, adapt, and scale or stop the solution.
    • Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in delivery evidence.

    Output

    delivery evidence

    delivery evidence · source · uncertainty · next decision

    Quality check

    Are outcome and guardrails evidenced?

    Pitfall

    A preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space. Reopen the problem space, seek disconfirming evidence, and make convergence criteria visible.

    Timing: 10–20 minutes

05

Artifact

What comes out at the end

Sketch: what the artifact looks like

Double Diamond · Deliberately Open and Close Problem and SolutionMake Discover, Define, Develop, and Deliver visible as two divergence-convergence movements
Double DiamondThe visual shows two diamonds: opening and closing the problem space, then opening and closing the solution space.Find the right problem first, then the fitting solutionThe model protects the team from jumping into solutions too early or leaving the problem space unclear.Starting questionstill fuzzyProblem statementfocused coreDelivered solutiontested and connectableDiscoverResearch, observation,...DefineCondense patternsDevelopGenerate broad solutionsDeliverTest and implementOpen problem spaceClose problem spaceOpen solution spaceClose solution space
Form

Versioned double diamond evidence trail with date, sources, owners, and next review.

Versioning / ownership

Retain date, source, assumption state, and decision for every version of double diamond evidence trail.

Tool alternatives
  • double diamond evidence trail as board or document
  • Source and evidence register
  • Decision and action log

double-diamond-working-template.md

Plan Double Diamond around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.

Double Diamond: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Full initiative Time: Several days to months

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: Challenge and constraints, access to affected people, decision and test capacity, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
  • Roles: Design/Research · Product · domain · Delivery · sponsor
  • Advance information: Collect Challenge and constraints, access to affected people, decision and test capacity in advance and mark open assumptions.
  • Overall time needed: Several days to months
  • Setup: Prepare two divergence-convergence cycles across problem and solution spaces visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.

Prepare for the work steps

Discover: Discover

  • Challenge and constraints
  • access to affected people
  • decision and test capacity

Define: Define

  • research evidence
  • access to affected people
  • decision and test capacity

Develop: Develop

  • defined challenge
  • access to affected people
  • decision and test capacity

Deliver: Deliver

  • tested options
  • access to affected people
  • decision and test capacity

double diamond evidence trail

Discover evidence

Discover evidence information to record

...

Defined challenge

Defined challenge information to record

...

Develop options

Develop options information to record

...

Deliver outcome

Deliver outcome information to record

...

Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.

Design Council: Double Diamond

Discover: Discover

Expected artifact: research evidence

research evidence · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Does research include conflicting perspectives?

Define: Define

Expected artifact: defined challenge

defined challenge · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Is the problem definition solution-neutral?

Develop: Develop

Expected artifact: tested options

tested options · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Do tests create decision-ready learning?

Deliver: Deliver

Expected artifact: delivery evidence

delivery evidence · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Are outcome and guardrails evidenced?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/double-diamond/run-sheet

06

Example output

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.

double-diamond-beispiel.md

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Discover: observe 18 hand-offs. Define: loss comes from inconsistent case summaries, not missing notifications. Develop: three summary models. Deliver: pilot with two teams reduces follow-ups from 34% to 16%; accessibility remains a guardrail.

07

Pitfalls

Recognize symptoms and steer against them

Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow

  1. DiscoverA preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space.View in phase
  2. DefineA preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space.View in phase
  3. DevelopA preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space.View in phase
  4. DeliverA preselected feature passes through the phases without reopening the problem space.View in phase
08

Stop criteria

When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach

double diamond evidence trail answers the core question with traceable evidence or explicitly marked uncertainty.
Owners, next actions, and review dates are named for open points.

Method after Design Council. Curated with 1 sources.

Sources: Design Council: Double Diamond

Flow, timeboxes, and pitfalls are editorially curated practice recommendations based on the listed sources.

Finished the method guide?

Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.