View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 8-15 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-10 | 3-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






