View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low |
Timesame | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tags1 shared | TeamCollaborationAgile | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
