View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Wardley Mapping |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Wardley Mapping makes visible where an offering stands today and where it can evolve. The method connects user need, value chain, and evolution stages into a strategic basis for platform, build, or buy decisions. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Wardley Map, Strategic Options, Evolution Notes | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | StrategySystems thinkingDynamics | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
