methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitysame
LowLow
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interviewBased on research question
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Affinity Diagramming
UX Research
Affinity Diagramming