methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitysame
MediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question5-12
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IARanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing