View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Innovation Crazy 8s |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 4-5 Tage | 8-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 5-8 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
