View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
