View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation | ![]() Systems Thinking Stock and Flow Diagram | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 2-6 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 1-6 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Stock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation Hypotheses | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






