View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Systems Thinking Stock and Flow Diagram |  Systems Thinking Polarity Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics. | Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 2-6 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 1-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Stock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation Hypotheses | Polarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance Actions |
Tags1 shared | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking | Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
