View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 45-90 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 3-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
