View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Strategy Map | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Product Strategy OKRs |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Strategy Map translates strategy into a few connected objectives across perspectives such as finance, customers, processes, and learning. This makes visible which capabilities and activities are meant to drive which results. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h workshop plus review | 2-6 h | 1-2 h Setup |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-8 | 2-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Strategy Map, Objective Set, Cause-Effect Hypotheses | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentExecutionGoalsCausality | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






