View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Operations Fishbone Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 15-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-3 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | Root causeQualityOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






