View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Decision Making Pareto Analysis |  Operations Eat the Frog |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min | 15-90 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-6 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Pareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
