View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Root Cause Tree Analysis | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Innovation Rolestorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When a search for ideas stalls, switching roles helps people step outside their own perspective and activate new logics of action. The method reduces habit because contributions arise from a different stance. This brings unfamiliar, often fitting solution approaches into play. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 2-6 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Cause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Rollenkarten, Ideenpool pro Rolle, Konsolidierte Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeTreeIncidentQuality | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | BrainstormingIdeationCreativity |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






