View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Facilitation Problem Framing Workshop |  Facilitation 3-Circle Venn Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When a team works on symptoms but the real question stays fuzzy, a Problem Framing Workshop sharpens the view of the right problem. It separates observation, interpretation, and target picture from each other. | When three perspectives matter at the same time, a Three-Circle Venn Diagram shows the overlaps and remainders precisely. It makes visible where shared effect arises and where only a partial perspective applies. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | 60-120 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 Reviewer | 4-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Problem Statement, Scope Boundaries, Assumption List, Next Analysis Questions | Venn Diagram, Overlap Notes, Differentiators |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | FacilitationAlignmentDiscovery | ComparisonFacilitationAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
