View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | AutonomyRolesTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
