View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Innovation Rolestorming |  Innovation Crazy 8s |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a search for ideas stalls, switching roles helps people step outside their own perspective and activate new logics of action. The method reduces habit because contributions arise from a different stance. This brings unfamiliar, often fitting solution approaches into play. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 8-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-12 | 1-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Rollenkarten, Ideenpool pro Rolle, Konsolidierte Shortlist | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativity | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
