View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Business Strategy Strategy Map |  Operations ALPEN Method |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | A Strategy Map translates strategy into a few connected objectives across perspectives such as finance, customers, processes, and learning. This makes visible which capabilities and activities are meant to drive which results. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 2-4 h workshop plus review | 10-20 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 4-10 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Strategy Map, Objective Set, Cause-Effect Hypotheses | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | AlignmentExecutionGoalsCausality | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
