View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Product Vision Board | ![]() UX Research Empathy Mapping | ![]() Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a product needs a shared direction, it connects target audience, benefit, and business picture in a clear vision. It makes the envisioned future legible for the team. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30–60 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Product Vision Board, Vision Statement, Assumptions and Validation Questions | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes |
Tagsno overlap | VisionCanvasStrategyAlignment | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






