View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Product Canvas |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When product goal and feature scope don't yet fit cleanly together, it creates a shared working picture. It connects need, core features, and assumptions into a solid starting point. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 10-20 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-100+ | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Canvas, Product Assumptions, Scope Notes | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | CanvasDiscoveryScope | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
