View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Innovation Design Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min | 4-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 2-10 | 5-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
