methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Porter’s five competitive forces
Business Strategy
Porter Five Forces
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Purposedifferent
Porter Five Forces analyzes the forces that shape competitive pressure and profitability in a market. The view of market structure goes beyond individual competitors and reveals systemic pressure points.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h2-4 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-123-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Five Forces Analysis, Competitive Risks, Strategic Options7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options
Tags1 shared
StrategyCompetitionMarket
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of a two-by-two Ansoff Matrix with four growth directions
Business Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis