View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Polarity Mapping |  Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation |  Systems Thinking Iceberg Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Polarity Mapping makes tensions between two opposing poles tangible, such as standardization and adaptation or control and autonomy. The method guards against making apparent either-or decisions prematurely. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Polarity Map, Warning Signs, Balance Actions | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas |
Tags1 shared | Systems thinkingTradeoffsLeadership | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
