View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Planning Poker | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Product Strategy KPI Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-5 min je Item | 30-90 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 3-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | KPI Tree, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






