methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two user profile cards with a goal, behavior evidence, and an open research question.
UX Research
Personas
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitysame
MediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Tage60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
Internes Team5-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario NotesRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
ResearchCustomerSynthesis
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration for Round Robin Brainstorming
Innovation
Round Robin Brainstorming