View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview | ![]() Facilitation Mind Mapping | ![]() Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 15-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 1-10 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






