View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming | ![]() Innovation Rolestorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | When a search for ideas stalls, switching roles helps people step outside their own perspective and activate new logics of action. The method reduces habit because contributions arise from a different stance. This brings unfamiliar, often fitting solution approaches into play. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 20-500+ | 4-10 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Rollenkarten, Ideenpool pro Rolle, Konsolidierte Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | BrainstormingIdeationCreativity |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






