View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-2 Tage | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | Based on research question | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | Information architectureNavigationFindability | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
