methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Value Stream Mapping workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Delivery
Value Stream Mapping
Paper illustration for Waste Analysis.
Operations
Waste Analysis
Purposedifferent
When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible.For a process that keeps people busy but creates little value, the method exposes waste. It directs attention to unnecessary movement, waiting times, rework, and overdelivery.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 h45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
10-504-102-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesCurrent-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck listWaste Map, Prioritized Waste, Improvement Backlog
Tagsno overlap
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
LeanFlowWasteDelivery
WasteLeanProcess improvement
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.