View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Architecture SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method) |  Decision Making Pareto Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | SAAM helps teams judge an architecture’s suitability for selected tasks and changes. It is particularly useful for examining modifiability and comparing architecture alternatives with clear reasoning. | In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | Preparation, scenario analysis, and findings review; effort depends on scope | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | Architecture experts and stakeholders for scenarios and weighting | 1-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Domain functions mapped to components and connections, Quality attributes and evaluation criteria, Typical tasks and their effects on the architecture, Reasoned evaluation or comparison of alternatives | Pareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | ArchitectureChangeAnalysisComparisonQuality | PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
