View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  UX Research HEART Framework |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min | 120 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-8 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | ICE Table, Top Idea List | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
