View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Delivery Cost of Delay |  Delivery Value Stream Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 90-180 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | LeanFlowWasteDelivery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
