View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 60-120 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
