View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Ideal Days |  Engineering Kanban |  Agile NoEstimates |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-60 min | Ongoing | laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-9 | 2-12 | 2-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing Rules |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortAgile | FlowVisual managementDelivery | EstimationForecastingFlow |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
