View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy ICE Scoring | ![]() UX Research Empathy Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Decision Jam |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30–60 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






