View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Product Strategy RICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 5-30 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
