View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation How Might We | ![]() Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation | ![]() Systems Thinking CATWOE Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a stuck problem carrying many implicit assumptions, the method translates observations into open, workable questions. It sharpens the problem frame without pre-thinking the solution, turning frustration or fuzziness into a search space with clear direction. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–45 min | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HMW Questions, Challenge Framing, Idea Prompts | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints |
Tagsno overlap | FramingOpportunityIdeationQuestions | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






