View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 60-120 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | StrategyMetricsExecution |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
