View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-5 Tage | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | GQM Table, Metric Profiles |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
