View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisSAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method)Future Reality Tree
| Criterion |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Architecture SAAM (Software Architecture Analysis Method) |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | SAAM helps teams judge an architecture’s suitability for selected tasks and changes. It is particularly useful for examining modifiability and comparing architecture alternatives with clear reasoning. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. |
Complexitysame | High | High | High |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | Preparation, scenario analysis, and findings review; effort depends on scope | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | Architecture experts and stakeholders for scenarios and weighting | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Domain functions mapped to components and connections, Quality attributes and evaluation criteria, Typical tasks and their effects on the architecture, Reasoned evaluation or comparison of alternatives | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections |
Tagsno overlap | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | ArchitectureChangeAnalysisComparisonQuality | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
