View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Facilitation Troika Consulting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 30-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 15-200 | 3-30 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | FacilitationCoachingLearning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






